|
On Stieger Lake * Victoria 952-443-1331 |
|
Island View Dining Waconia. 952-442-2956 |
|
Chaska School of Dance Mary Pieper 952-873-6781 |
|
Fahey’s Window Cleaning 952-467-2447 |
|
Country Life Therapeutic Massage Jan Sutton, M.A. * 952-474-0999 |
|
MVT Excavating No job is too small. 952-446-9341 |
|
Weinzierl Jewelers |
|
Waconia 952-442-2885 |
|
“Trees Are Our Roots” 8099 Bavaria Rd * Victoria * 952-443-2990 |
|
1915 Arboretum Blvd * Victoria 952-443-2808 |
|
Headlines and bylines |
|
Front Page Feature Story |
|
From the Editor |
|
Addie’s Drawing |
|
Letters to the Editor |
|
Victoria Moments |
|
Hook Line & Sinker |
|
Calendar of Events |
|
Click here to Advertise |
|
the Gazette |
|
Return to Home Page |
|
Order paper Gazette |
|
Notes and Quotes |
|
The Scoop at City Hall |
|
Home Page |
|
The Victoria GAZETTE |
|
City Scoop Continued |
|
Content of the letter or letters, and questions, to the MCWD centers on land use, wasting dollars to purchase green space that the City of Victoria gets free through development agreements, and rules of the game. “What obligation does the Watershed District have to respond to us?” asked Councilmember Roden. “Nothing probably legal,” replied City Attorney Mike Norton, “but out of respect they might.” Stated Councilmember Amundsen, “I think this is an issue where we grab the ball and run with it, as Senator Ortman has said.” He added, however, “I’d like to get the answers in a dialogue and not a duel.” “This is addressed to the Watershed District, but it’s far larger than that,” said Councilmember Paulsen. “It’s my assessment that the letter wasn’t written; it was built.” Said Councilmember O’Connor, “There are two audiences for the letter. First is the Watershed District, and the next is yet to be defined.” Mayor Thun spoke about the letter and the language in the letter. “Unfortunately, I cannot be in favor of this,” she said. “The way the original letter has been drafted, I cannot support it. One of the most important things to me is to work with other entities and that list is endless.” “Having studied all of the documents, having talked to one of the Hennepin County Supervisors, I think some of the language is inappropriate,” continued the mayor. “Regardless of the size of our city, we have an obligation to be at their meetings if we feel it’s necessary. “We have received letters from the District president. I’m not comfortable with saying to another agency that they have not been communicating to us ... “I believe we as a council, as a city, have very important questions to ask the Watershed District. I don’t believe a letter or letters should be in a lecturing tone. I strongly request that you take a look at the letter that I have prepared. I believe I’ve removed all of the lecturing or repetitive statements.” Stated Councilmember Roden, “I don’t see the statements as lecturing but as putting things on record. If someone wants to get offended, that’s certainly their choice. We’re just stating facts, which is an appropriate thing for us to do.” “I’m at the point where we should be very clear about what we believe,” continued Councilmember Roden. “I’m not opposed to hearings alternatives to the letter, but I’m looking for answers. I don’t interpret the letter as lecturing. They can tell us where we’re wrong. It’s transparency. I don’t see a need to be overly diplomatic. Another body has told us how to do our job, so there’s a lot of offense to go around.” Before the split vote occurred, Councilmember Paulsen had said, “It’s my hope this will clear the air and we’ll have many good things to do with the Watershed District.” *** City Attorney Mike Norton reported March 22nd that several bills have been introduced at the State Capitol whereby plans of Watershed Districts must be approved by the counties within which they operate. “It has not had a hearing. I’ll be watching it,” he said. Reported Jim Paulsen on March 22nd, “I attended a meeting of the lake cities in Mound. There are many cities, with varying interests, varying knowledge. I think it’s unclear as to who exactly is in charge at the Watershed District. It’s less clear who approves their budget. It’s a tangled web. It’s a complicated circumstance. Hennepin County is sort of like the House Ways and Means Committee. They can control the money but they don’t.” *** The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was formed in 1967 by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners “to protect, improve, and manage water resources, runoff, and related natural resources for 129 lakes, 8 major creeks, and thousands of wetlands located within the 181 square mile watershed of Minnehaha Creek and Lake Minnetonka, in partnership with 29 communities, other agencies, and concerned citizens.”
|
|
Sue’s Album A symphony of photos and fewer than a thousand words at www.VictoriaGazette.com |
|
April 2010 |
